Files
container/Sources/CLI/Container/ContainerDelete.swift
Morris Richman dd6bdc20cf Expose Command Structs for Plugins (#603)
## Type of Change
- [ ] Bug fix
- [x] New feature  
- [ ] Breaking change
- [ ] Documentation update

## Motivation and Context
Plugins technically exist, but to add shortcuts or to do existing things
with functions in `container` requires calling a compiled binary. This
pull request aims to remove that hurdle and instability by exposing
commands as a new `ContainerCommands ` target.

Simply import `ContainerCommands` and you can access almost
any command as if it were a native part of the binary. This makes
plugin development significantly easier.

Closes #609.
2025-09-17 15:24:26 -07:00

123 lines
4.6 KiB
Swift

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Copyright © 2025 Apple Inc. and the container project authors. All rights reserved.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
import ArgumentParser
import ContainerClient
import ContainerizationError
import Foundation
extension Application {
public struct ContainerDelete: AsyncParsableCommand {
public init() {}
public static let configuration = CommandConfiguration(
commandName: "delete",
abstract: "Delete one or more containers",
aliases: ["rm"])
@Flag(name: .shortAndLong, help: "Force the removal of one or more running containers")
var force = false
@Flag(name: .shortAndLong, help: "Remove all containers")
var all = false
@OptionGroup
var global: Flags.Global
@Argument(help: "Container IDs/names")
var containerIDs: [String] = []
public func validate() throws {
if containerIDs.count == 0 && !all {
throw ContainerizationError(.invalidArgument, message: "no containers specified and --all not supplied")
}
if containerIDs.count > 0 && all {
throw ContainerizationError(
.invalidArgument,
message: "explicitly supplied container ID(s) conflict with the --all flag"
)
}
}
public mutating func run() async throws {
let set = Set<String>(containerIDs)
var containers = [ClientContainer]()
if all {
containers = try await ClientContainer.list()
} else {
let ctrs = try await ClientContainer.list()
containers = ctrs.filter { c in
set.contains(c.id)
}
// If one of the containers requested isn't present, let's throw. We don't need to do
// this for --all as --all should be perfectly usable with no containers to remove; otherwise,
// it'd be quite clunky.
if containers.count != set.count {
let missing = set.filter { id in
!containers.contains { c in
c.id == id
}
}
throw ContainerizationError(
.notFound,
message: "failed to delete one or more containers: \(missing)"
)
}
}
var failed = [String]()
let force = self.force
let all = self.all
try await withThrowingTaskGroup(of: String?.self) { group in
for container in containers {
group.addTask {
do {
if container.status == .running && !force {
guard all else {
throw ContainerizationError(.invalidState, message: "container is running")
}
return nil // Skip running container when using --all
}
try await container.delete(force: force)
print(container.id)
return nil
} catch {
log.error("failed to delete container \(container.id): \(error)")
return container.id
}
}
}
for try await ctr in group {
guard let ctr else {
continue
}
failed.append(ctr)
}
}
if failed.count > 0 {
throw ContainerizationError(
.internalError,
message: "delete failed for one or more containers: \(failed)"
)
}
}
}
}