Covers issue 3794 directly: a community made of real code nodes plus
a rationale docstring fragment node and a concept node must only
count and list the real code nodes in its Nodes (N) line, matching
the exact repro shape from the issue. Confirmed against pre fix code
via git stash, the test fails there and reproduces the issue's own
example output almost exactly.
(cherry picked from commit 02435f5dd3)
Covers issue 3801 directly: a code plus concept only graph (no
document, paper or image nodes anywhere) must not offer undocumented
components as a reason for an isolated node, only possible missing
edges. Adding a single document node elsewhere in the same graph
shape brings the fuller reason back, confirming the gate tracks the
graph's actual content rather than being tied to a particular test
fixture shape.
Confirmed against pre fix code via git stash: the first test fails
there and passes only with the fix applied.
(cherry picked from commit 02e1b4d6c2)
Three existing tests pinned the old, undercounting behavior directly,
including one whose own docstring asserted the exact shape this fix
corrects. Updates all three to the now correct figures and adds a
dedicated test asserting the two invariants the issue itself
suggested, shown equals what actually renders and shown plus thin
equals the total, at both thresholds already exercised in this file.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017qfdzgbA5KedGEjD1AayNh
(cherry picked from commit dd056ab9a8)
The GRAPH_REPORT headline figures disagreed: shown-community count included empty communities
the render loop skips, and the knowledge-gaps thin count used a hardcoded 3 beside a label
printing min_community_size. Drive every figure from one _real_count predicate so the counts
reconcile with what is actually rendered.
ayushcodes10