* Use `:` form instead of `~`, for better compatibility with other
markdown implementations.
* Don't wrap the term, because it breaks definition lists.
This way you can still get the raw latex back, even if you don't
process with citeproc. Previously, cites were not visible at all
unless you specified --biblio on the command line and converted
them using citeproc, or used --natbib or --biblatex.
* The new reader is more robust, accurate, and extensible.
It is still quite incomplete, but it should be easier
now to add features.
* Text.Pandoc.Parsing: Added withRaw combinator.
* Markdown reader: do escapedChar before raw latex inline.
Otherwise we capture commands like \{.
* Fixed latex citation tests for new citeproc.
* Handle \include{} commands in latex.
This is done in pandoc.hs, not the (pure) latex reader.
But the reader exports the needed function, handleIncludes.
* Moved err and warn from pandoc.hs to Shared.
* Fixed tests - raw tex should sometimes have trailing space.
* Updated lhs-test for highlighting-kate changes.
* New module `Text.Pandoc.Docx`.
* New output format `docx`.
* Added reference.docx.
* New option `--reference-docx`.
The writer includes support for highlighted code blocks
and math (which is converted from TeX to OMML using
texmath's new OMML module).
Pandoc previously behaved like Markdown.pl for consecutive
lists of different styles. Thus, the following would be parsed
as a single ordered list, rather than an ordered list followed
by an unordered list:
1. one
2. two
- one
- two
This patch makes pandoc behave more sensibly, parsing this as
two lists. Any change in list type (ordered/unordered) or in
list number style will trigger a new list. Thus, the following
will also be parsed as two lists:
1. one
2. two
a. one
b. two
Since we regard this as a bug in Markdown.pl, and not something
anyone would ever rely on, we do not preserve the old behavior
even when `--strict` is selected.
* `---` is always em-dash, `--` is always en-dash.
* pandoc no longer tries to guess when `-` should be en-dash.
* A new option, `--old-dashes`, is provided for legacy documents.
Rationale: The rules for en-dash are too complex and
language-dependent for a guesser to work reliably. This
change gives users greater control. The alternative of
using unicode isn't very good, since unicode em- and en-
dashes are barely distinguishable in a monospace font.
John MacFarlane