mirror of
https://github.com/HeyPuter/puter.git
synced 2026-10-02 18:08:13 +00:00
a63172e9ae59e54df3aba0ef2df9a0c9f3d451aa
11
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
72203152d9 |
fix: bound a scoped token to what it issued, which is nothing
CI caught three HTTP-level tests the earlier merge left behind, and they were right to fail: dropping this branch's `manage` gate in favour of main's row filter lost a case main's filter does not cover. Main bounds an app to the rows it issued. A *scoped* access token is not an app, so it was falling through unbounded — `/fs/stat` with `return_shares` handed a `fs:<uid>:list` token the owner's whole share list. Addresses stayed withheld, but who else can reach a file is no more a narrow token's business than the addresses are. So the filter is generalised rather than the gate restored: a scoped token is bounded to nothing, since it issues nothing under its own name. Filtering it by a null app would have been worse than not filtering — that matches the owner's own rows. Apps and sessions behave exactly as they do on main, and a full-access token still holds the account's reach. The three tests now assert the answer instead of a refusal, including the one whose name had always promised a refusal its body never checked. |
||
|
|
461cb7d0a9 |
fix: close two gaps the review found in the invite-address fix
- A full-access token was denied the address while `shared-by-me` still handed it the same rows, so the clause bought no privacy and cost an API client the address `unshare()` takes. `isAccountContext` is the boundary the rest of the codebase already uses for 'acting as the account': plain session or full-access token, never a scoped one. - The Dashboard share modal dropped a withheld invite entirely, since its aggregate keys a pending row on the address — so a delegate saw no sign of an outstanding invite and accessCount under-reported who could reach the item. It is now kept, keyed on the share uid, labelled, and without the controls that would need a recipient to address. |
||
|
|
3e3d02bafe |
fix: stop disclosing invite addresses to apps, tokens and delegates
getShares (and stat's return_shares, which runs the same listing) gated on #assertCanManage's default 'see' mode, so any credential that could see the node got every unclaimed invite's raw email — including an app handed one file by the picker, a list-scoped token on the stat surface, and a manage delegate reading the owner's invitees. Two bounds, matching the invariant clientShare.ts already claimed: - An invite's address goes only to the item's owner and to whoever sent it, and never to an app or token. A delegate can revoke only what they issued, so withholding costs them nothing they could act on. - An app or token must hold manage reach of its own to read the listing at all; it answers for the ancestors too, which is not what being handed one file grants. tryListSharesOf turns that into an empty shares array, so stat itself keeps working. The share dialog names an unattributable invite rather than rendering a blank row with a dead revoke button. Closes PUT-1806. |
||
|
|
5f37817a5c | feat: notification type registry and audience rules (PUT-1665) (#3671) | ||
|
|
1736d23ee7 |
Ds/put 1674 (#3715)
* feat: app-scoped share listing and revoke surface (PUT-1670) * fix: address review on app-scoped share surface - Scope the uid-addressed revoke to the named row: only that row's issuer's grant is withdrawn, and only that one invite cancelled — an app or owner addressing one row no longer takes another issuer's grant on the same (item, recipient) pair with it. - Delete a pending row directly on uid-addressed revoke, so an invite whose address registered but never claimed can still be withdrawn. - Read the legacy `issuerAppUid` data key in the SQL app filter and grouping, alongside the unified `issuedByApp`. - Refuse malformed `appUid` input (duplicated param, empty string) instead of silently listing everything, and refuse app-listing cursors that decode but name no appUid. - Derive the acting app from `effectiveApp` alone, per the actor contract; drop the second derivation site. - Pin the attribution semantics with tests: one row records one issuance, so re-sharing the same pair re-attributes it to whoever issued last, in both directions. - Soften the uniform-404 docblocks to what the gates actually answer. * feat: readable grant audit trail (PUT-1674) * fix: cover the apps summary's no-app-group first page (PUT-1670) listOutboundApps sorts the no-app group first via an empty-string sentinel. Add a regression test pinning that a first page (no cursor) actually returns it, and that the cursor it hands back resumes past it into the app-keyed groups rather than skipping or repeating. |
||
|
|
66a975f659 |
feat: global outbound share listing (PUT-1664) (#3694)
* feat: global outbound share listing (PUT-1664) * fix: address review on outbound share listing - Check share-row liveness per (holder, entry, issuer) so a grant withdrawn outside unshare doesn't stay listed while another issuer still reaches the same holder; batch the permission reads across the whole page instead of per holder. - Retire a revoked issuer's unclaimed invites in the revoke cascade, and hide invites whose issuer lost their authority at read time. - Unify the pending/active app-attribution key on `issuedByApp` and dual-read the legacy `issuerAppUid` spelling. - Add the missing share issuer index (sqlite, postgres) and correct the listOutbound plan comment. - Refuse cursors that decode but name no id instead of silently restarting from page one. - Consolidate the five hand-built ResolvedShare literals and the two listing endpoints' parse/shape code. - Ship the SDK surface: puter.fs.listSharedByMe() with docs, types, suite coverage, and the rate-limit page entry. |
||
|
|
94d798ccce |
fix: close /share/blocks to app tokens
All three block routes set only `subdomain`, `requireVerified` and a rate limit, and the controller's actor check accepts anything carrying a user, so an app-under-user token passed. Unlike `share` and `revoke`, nothing else bounded them: an app the user authorized once could read exactly whom they had blocked, then clear the list — blanket switch and per-username — and reopen the channel. A block list is a personal safety control, not something an app can otherwise reach, so it falls outside the "an app can share what it can already reach" carve-out the other share routes rely on. `requireUserActor` on all three, and deliberately without `allowFullAccessToken`: this is security management, which stays closed to every access token, personal ones included. The only caller is the desktop's Blocked Senders window, which sends the user's own session token. Tests fail without the gate: an app token minted through /auth/get-user-app-token is refused on all three routes while the user's own session still succeeds, and a metadata check pins the gate on every block route so a fourth cannot quietly ship without it. |
||
|
|
4b3d1112d1 |
Say when a share changed nothing
Sharing a file with someone who already had it answered "Shared with X", the same as a first share, so the dialog claimed to have done something it had not. The service already knew — it computes isNew to decide whether to notify the recipient — but the flag stopped at the controller. It now travels on share results only; a listing describes standing access and says nothing about it. Which of the three things happened is settled client-side, since the mode each recipient holds is already on screen: created access, raised or lowered it, or changed nothing. That keeps the previous mode off the wire, and an older backend that omits isNew still reads as a share, which is what these dialogs said before. |
||
|
|
5e1645d40e |
🔧 PUT-1524: Sanity check file sharing api (#3603)
* fix: sharing answers "who can reach this" from the grants, not the index Two ways a share listing could name access that was no longer there. A recipient's listing paired the flat permission read with the list of permissions it asked for by array index. That read drops misses and dedupes its keys, so the two are not positional: one entry's live grant vouched for another entry that had none, and listShared() kept publishing a withdrawn item's name, size and signed thumbnail URL to someone who could no longer open it. Read the permission off the value instead. getShares() had the same gap from the owner's side, with no liveness check at all — a grant withdrawn through /auth/revoke-user-user or an ACL mode change left the index row behind, and the owner was told someone could reach a file they could not. Checked against the grants now, one batched read per distinct holder. Pending invites are not subject to it: they have no grant yet, which is the point of them. Also covers the access-token actor, which reaches the same reach bound as an app through a different arm of the ACL check. No behavior change there — it was correct and untested. * test: pin that a revoke crosses regions A revoke reaches a peer region as a replicated SQL delete plus three invalidation events, one per cache the region owns: the u2u row cache, the flat view and the scan generation. The delete alone changes nothing there, and each cache has a different consequence if its event is lost — 20s for the generation, 5 minutes for the row cache, and forever for the flat view, whose grant-path entries carry no expiry. Nothing covered the whole path end to end. The store tests prove each event is emitted and applied; this proves the result, which is that the recipient stops being able to read. It asserts the read still succeeds after the SQL delete alone, so the test also records why replication is not sufficient on its own. * test: pin that a leaked uuid buys no access A masked share path hides which folder an item sits in; it was never the thing deciding who may open it. Nothing checked that at the route level, so the guarantee rested on unit tests of the resolver alone. Reads one shared file through its masked path, then tries the sibling four ways: the shared uuid with the sibling's name, the sibling's own uuid, a `..` back out of the root, and the owner's real path. Worth knowing about this one: it's mutation-checked. Removing the head !== root.name guard in sharePathMask.ts fails it with reachable: /testuser/55dd54c0…/share-http-1df8933e.txt. I verified that specifically because two tests I wrote earlier in this chunk passed with their guards broken — both were vacuous, and I deleted them rather than commit false assurance. * docs: say what listShared's total actually counts `total` counts the shares recorded for you; items are filtered after the page is read, so a withdrawn grant leaves the count higher than anything paging will yield. The page description already explained the short-page behaviour, but the field read as an exact count and the example printed it as one. The test pins the gap it describes: two shares, one withdrawn outside the index, one item listed and a total of two. * fix: keep an undelivered broadcast event instead of dropping it The outbound queue was cleared before the send, so a peer that timed out took its events with it. Most were survivable — a lost cache invalidation heals when the entry's TTL lapses. A revoke's flat-perm invalidation is not: grant-path entries carry no expiry, so a peer went on serving a withdrawn grant until something else wrote that key. Failed sends now go back on the queue, which the existing flush timer retries. Anything queued since wins over the retry, and the queue is bounded at 10,000 with the oldest dropped first, so a peer that stays down cannot grow it without limit. Each retry is signed at send time, so it is not rejected against the replay window. * fix: stop plus-addressing from deciding who a share reaches |
||
|
|
b795b219a8 |
✨ PUT-1497: Share file link sharing and notifications (#3595)
* refactor(share): move share notifications into their own service
* feat(share): invite an address with no account, and email it
* feat(share): surface pending invites in the SDK and share dialog
* fix(share): unreachable revoke confirmation, and double-encoded labels
* feat(share): budget share announcements, group them, and let people block senders
Sharing had one defence against noise: a 15-minute quiet window per (sender,
recipient) pair, which dropped the second share rather than folding it in.
Twenty senders each under their own window could still bury someone, and there
was no way to make one of them stop.
Announcements are now budgeted on two axes through the existing sliding-window
limiter: 1 per 15 minutes and 20 per day from one sender, and 10 per hour /
50 per day to one recipient from anyone. Over budget the share still succeeds
and the recipient's notification is still brought up to date — only the
interruption is dropped. Invite email to an address with no account is budgeted
the same way, keyed on a hash of the canonical address.
Notifications now fold across senders: a new share rewrites the notification
the recipient hasn't dismissed, so "alice and bob shared 5 items with you"
replaces a stack of five. The record is written even when suppressed, so the
count is right whenever they next look.
Blocking is a new `user_block` table with enforcement in ShareService: a blocked
sender's share is refused with `recipient_not_accepting_shares`, spends no
quota, and writes no row, and their unclaimed invite is dropped when the address
is confirmed. Existing access is untouched — that is what revoke is for.
Managed from a Blocked people card in the dashboard's Security tab.
Also publishes the sharing limits, including the ones already on this branch
that were never documented.
* fix(share): name the item in share email, instead of 'an item'
* fix(share): make the invite lifecycle canonical, authorized, and race-safe
* refactor(email): drop EmailClient.isConfigured; callers read config.email
* feat(share): batch share email into a per-recipient digest, durably
* docs(share): document the share error codes; steady the disk migration tests
* fix(share): log why a digest wasn't sent, and recover orphaned ones
* feat(share): email recipients about shares by default, with a way to decline
Share email was off unless a deployment opted in, which meant an account
holder was told about a share in the app only. It is now on unless
`share_email_notifications` is set to false.
The reason it defaulted off was that nobody could decline. So this also
honors `user.unsubscribed` — the account-wide opt-out the /unsubscribe page
already writes and app feedback already respects, which share email ignored —
and the digest carries that link. Sharing and the in-app notification are
unaffected by it; only the mail stops.
The link is composed in the template around an interpolated uuid rather than
passed pre-built: Handlebars escapes interpolated values, so a whole URL came
out as `user_uuid=…`, which browsers decode but link scanners and older
mail clients need not.
* fix(share): count every shared file in the digest, not just the first
* feat(share): let a recipient refuse shares from everyone
Blocking answered "not from this person" but had no answer to "not from
anyone", so the only way to stop a stream of unwanted shares was to name
each sender after they had already reached you.
Stored as a key in the user row's existing `metadata` blob rather than a
column: the share path already holds the recipient's row by the time it
asks, so reading it costs nothing, and a one-bit preference doesn't earn
a migration per dialect. `updateMetadata` merges and refreshes the cached
row, so the switch bites on the very next share.
Refusing everyone reports the same code as refusing one person — which of
the two it is is the recipient's business, not the sender's. Enforced at
both moments the per-sender block is: when the share is issued, and when
a pending invite is claimed. The per-sender list is untouched while the
blanket switch is on, so turning it off restores what it hid.
`GET /share/blocks` now carries `all`; `POST`/`DELETE` take `{ all: true }`
beside the existing `{ username }`. Managed from the same Blocked people
card in the dashboard's Security tab.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(share): keep the digest sweep off a window that still has a timer
The sweep treated an entry as orphaned the moment its window closed, which
is also the moment the node that armed it fires. Claiming an entry is only
exclusive among flushers that can see each other's deletes, so the two
could each claim a share of the same digest and both send. It now waits
out a grace period first, which costs a genuinely stranded digest that
much delay and nothing else.
Both digest listings were capped at 200 with no word when they hit it — a
truncated flush sends a digest that undercounts and reads as complete.
The cap is named and logged.
Also: `#emailHolder` still described share email as off by default, which
it stopped being; the config doc said the batch window defaults to 60s
when it is 90; and the two tests that need several calls inside one window
were racing a 50ms window across four sequential round trips, so they
failed under full-suite load rather than on the behaviour they cover.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(share): stop double-encoding the recipient in two dialog messages
`i18n()` encodes what it returns, replacements included, so encoding the
recipient first showed the entities to anyone whose address or username
contains one. Same pattern already fixed two lines above.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(notification): widen the mysql shown/acknowledged columns
Both arrived from the v1 schema as `tinyint(1)`, where they were flags.
The backend rework changed the writes to a unix second; sqlite (`INTEGER`)
and postgres (`bigint`) took it and mysql did not, so on mysql every
`markShown` and `markAcknowledged` has failed with
ER_WARN_DATA_OUT_OF_RANGE and left the column NULL. Dismissing a
notification never stuck — the unacknowledged count never moved and one
already delivered came back on every reconnect.
No backfill: every reader tests `IS NULL` / `IS NOT NULL` only, so a
legacy `1` keeps meaning "yes" once widened. Guarded on the current type,
because changing a column type copies the table and this directory
replays on every boot.
Not reachable from the test suite — it runs against sqlite and postgres,
both of which already have the right type. Verified by hand against mysql:
`/notif/mark-read` and `/notif/mark-ack` now persist, and a dismissed
share notification is no longer the one a later share folds into.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Daniel Salazar <daniel.salazar@puter.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
2c852bf6b3 |
✨ PUT-1412 File sharing backend api (#3553)
* refactor(permissions): drop hardcoded group permission map for a flat default
* test(drivers): assert credential-gate intent instead of a 403 proxy
* fix(permissions): report whether a revoke removed anything and persist the linked grant row before the flat view
* feat(permissions): replicate permission invalidations across regions
* feat(share): extend the share table into an index of active shares
* feat(share): query and maintain active shares in ShareStore
* feat(users): add a batched lookup by email
* fix(cache): apply cache updates broadcast from peer regions
* fix(permissions): scope a revoke to the issuer that granted it
* feat(share): add ShareService with a per-day share limit
A share is two writes that belong together: the permission grant, which
authorizes access, and a share row, which makes it listable and ties it to an
fsentry so it dies with the file. Nothing else grants fs:* to a user.
Authorization reuses canManagePermission — an owner satisfies it through the
is-owner implicator, a delegate through an explicit manage:fs:<uid> grant. An
owner may clear any issuer's share of their node; anyone else only the ones
they issued, or their own access. Self-revoke skips the manage gate but still
requires `see`, so it cannot be used to probe for files.
The per-day limit counts shares created rather than live rows, so revoking and
re-sharing cannot recycle a slot, and changing an existing share's mode is not
new reach and does not spend budget. Tunable via share_daily_limit.
* feat(share): expose sharing over HTTP
POST /share, POST /share/revoke, GET /share/shared-with-me, GET /share/shares.
The controller was registered but entirely commented out.
Recipients × items fan out concurrently — every pair is a distinct
(holder, entry) key, so none of them contend — bounded by
runWithConcurrencyLimitSettled, which returns results index-aligned with the
input for the per-pair outcome list. Responses carry usernames only, never
internal ids, and the 404-not-403 rule is preserved so a failed call cannot
confirm a file the caller could not otherwise see. Notifications are fired off
the response path; a share must not fail over its own notification.
Per-request caps on recipients and items bound one call's fan-out; the daily
limit bounds the total.
* feat(share): keep recipients consistent when a shared item changes
* fix(fs): stop listing issuer homes at the filesystem root
* fix(acl): serialize concurrent mode changes on one node and pin app containment on shared paths
* fix(fs): expire signed URLs over entries the signer doesn't own
signFile defaults to a ~317k-year TTL and verifySignature checks only uid,
expires and signature — never the ACL. A recipient who ever signed a shared
file therefore held a permanent, revocation-proof URL to its bytes: revoking
the share did nothing to it.
signEntry now takes the acting user and drops to NON_OWNER_SIGNATURE_TTL_SECONDS
(1 hour) when the signer is not the entry's owner. Owners keep the permanent
default, so no existing client changes behavior.
The signature-authenticated directory listing bounds its children
unconditionally: that route has no session actor, and a signature proves
possession rather than ownership, so a recipient holding a short-lived
directory signature could otherwise mint permanent URLs for every child.
A bounded window is not revocation — the durable fix is a per-entry signature
epoch folded into the HMAC and bumped on any permission change.
* refactor(permissions): drop the unused permission-issuer lookup
listUserPermissionIssuers and its store method listUserPermissionIssuerIds
existed to synthesize the filesystem root from the home directories of everyone
who had granted the caller a permission. That listing is gone — it advertised
folders readdir then refused to open — and the share index answers "who shared
with me" directly, so nothing wants them back.
One removed test only asserted that the call returned an array; the other
covered readLinkedUserUserPerms round-tripping and is kept, rewritten without
the issuer lookup.
* fix(share): return the created share, not just an acknowledgement
* feat(puter.js): add file sharing to puter.fs
share(), unshare(), listShared() and getShares() on puter.fs, following the
existing FS operation shape: positional and options-object forms through
defineOperation, JSDoc overloads as the published signature, relative paths
resolved against the app's root directory.
A bare recipient string is read as an email when it contains @ and as a
username otherwise. Sharing an item with someone who already has it replaces
their access rather than stacking a second grant, so raising read to write is
one more call.
Adds a sharing suite to the API runner, which passes unchanged on node,
browser and workerd. Documents all four methods with runnable examples, and
corrects the FS overview callout that told readers one user cannot read
another's files — true before this, not after.
* feat(gui): add a Shared folder for items others shared with you
A sidebar entry listing everything other users have shared with you, backed by
puter.fs.listShared().
The path is the sentinel `puter://shared` rather than /<user>/Shared: this is a
query, not a directory, and a path-shaped value could collide with a folder
someone actually creates. refresh_item_container and update_window_path both
branch on it to skip the stat there is no fsentry for, and the listing swaps
readdir for listShared.
Entries render at their real paths under their owners' directories — the item
container already preferred an explicit fsentry.path over joining onto the
container, so nothing else had to change. Each carries who shared it and at
what level, which the context menu reads next.
* feat(gui): share items from the context menu
A sharing dialog shaped like its neighbours — options object, HTML-string
template, jQuery wiring, delegating to UIWindow() — with a recipient field, a
read/edit/share dropdown, and the current access list with revoke buttons.
Reached from a new "Share…" context menu entry, which is hidden on items shared
*with* you: re-sharing needs manage, so the dialog would only surface an error.
Those items get "Remove from Shared" in place of Delete. Delete moves an item
to *your* trash, which for someone else's file means moving their data out of
their tree — FSService refuses it, and the user saw a bare 403. Removing your
own access is what the action was reaching for, so that is what it now does.
* fix(share): withdraw what a removed recipient re-shared
* feat(share): report access inherited from a parent folder
* fix(gui): load the puter.js bundle the server configured
* refactor(gui): extract the action icon set into a helper
* feat(gui): surface Shared in the file browser
* feat(gui): manage access from the share dialog
* test(share): cover access inherited from a parent folder
* fix(share): keep downstream access from surviving a delegate who leaves
* fix(gui): name the real owner in the share dialog
* fix(gui): page through every shared item instead of the first 50
* feat(share): return item metadata with a share
* fix(share): invalidate a holder's cache when the entry is deleted
* fix(gui): treat items inside a shared folder as someone else's
* feat(permissions): let manage inherit down the filesystem tree
Access already reached descendants through the ancestor chain while authority did not, so someone trusted to manage a shared folder could re-share the folder but nothing inside it, and could not see who had access to a file within it.
A manage-inherits-from-ancestor implicator resolves it in the permission layer, beside is-owner, so every caller agrees rather than just ShareService. It consults only the immediate parent — resolving that re-enters one level up, making a chain of depth d cost d checks rather than d².
That makes two cascade gaps reachable, both fixed here. A revoke now walks the subtree, since a grant on a descendant can rest on authority held at the folder. And it stops at a delegate whose authority survives another issuer, because what they granted was never theirs to lose.
Also pins that manage is not transitive: granting it needs manage:manage:fs:<uid>, which only the owner holds, so delegation is one level deep by construction.
* fix(gui): offer sharing inside a folder you manage
The menus encoded "manage does not inherit" and would now hide an action that works. The Shared listing records each root's mode; the menus resolve a child's by longest matching ancestor, loading on demand so a deep link or restored window works too.
* fix(share): make the daily share limit hold under concurrency
* test(share): cover concurrency, measure cost, and name cases for what they verify
* fix(gui): import the ownership helpers the item menu calls
The single-item context menu handler calls is_owned_by_me and
shared_mode_for, but the imports were only ever added to
generate_file_context_menu.js — so every right-click on an item threw a
ReferenceError before the menu could build, and the non-owner Delete
gating never ran.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(share): authorize before resolving the recipient
share() looked up the recipient in parallel with the entry, before the
manage check — and the two failures carried different error codes. Any
verified user with a real entry uid could probe arbitrary emails and
usernames for account existence, at no quota cost. Resolve the entry,
authorize, and only then resolve the recipient: an unauthorized caller
now sees the identical safe 404 whether or not the recipient exists.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(permissions): broadcast permission row-cache invalidations to peer regions
Every publishCacheKeys call for the u2u, u2a, and access-token row
caches omitted broadcast, so a revoke only cleared the mutating
region's Redis. A peer region applied the replicated generation bump,
re-scanned, read the deleted row from its own still-warm 5-minute row
cache, and re-warmed the flat view from it — revoked access outlived
the revoke by the row-cache TTL instead of the intended 60-second
bound. CacheReplicationService already consumes these events; the
emits were just never sent.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(fs): refuse to rename an entry owned by another user
remove and move both refuse to act on an entry the caller does not
own, even when the ACL allows the write — rename had no such guard, so
a write-mode share recipient could rename the owner's file, or the
shared folder itself, rewriting the owner's whole subtree's paths.
rename now takes the acting user and applies the same policy.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(permissions): decide a flat delete from the primary, not a lagging replica
revokeUserUserPermission deletes the SQL grant, then only drops the
flat KV entry once no issuer still grants the permission. That
remaining-check read through the row cache the delete had just
invalidated, straight to a replica — under any lag the deleted row
reappeared, the flat delete was skipped, and the stale rows were
re-cached for another five minutes. Grant-path flat entries carry no
TTL, so the holder kept working access with zero SQL rows behind it,
invisible to every listing. The check now reads the primary and
re-warms the cache with what it actually saw.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(permissions): keep a failed remote flat-invalidation from crashing the process
The outer.permission.flatInvalidated applier was fire-and-forget with
no catch, and it awaits a KV delete — one transient KV error while
applying a peer region's revoke became an unhandled rejection, which
is process-fatal under default Node. Its sibling appliers were already
guarded; this one now logs and moves on, leaving the entry to the next
invalidation or its TTL, same as a lost event.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(share): revoke every requested item and recipient, not just the first
revokeShare destructured only the first recipient and first item while
the parsers accept arrays up to the request caps — unshare({items:
[a, b, c]}) returned success having revoked only a, leaving access the
caller believes is gone. Revoke now fans out over every (recipient,
item) pair exactly like POST /share, reports per-pair outcomes, and
sums the revoked count; the response stays backward compatible.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(share): only a confirmed email designates a recipient
Recipient resolution by email accepted unconfirmed accounts, so
pre-registering someone else's address (unconfirmed) was enough to
receive shares meant for them once no confirmed account held it.
An email now only resolves to an account that has confirmed it;
username shares are unaffected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(share): accept tilde-rooted paths like the FS routes do
The SDK resolves relative paths to ~/..., but the share routes never
expanded the tilde — a ~-prefixed string was read as a uid and every
relative-path call 404'd. Item parsing now treats ~ as path-shaped and
expands it to the actor's home with the same helper the legacy FS
routes use, on share, revoke, and the shares listing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(share): walk a directory revoke by parent linkage, not path prefix
listByFsentrySubtree matched descendants with fsentry_id = ? OR path
LIKE ?, which has two problems: fsentries.path is lazily backfilled
and NULL on old rows, so those descendants' shares silently survived a
directory revoke, and the OR'd predicates forced a scan of every
active share. A recursive CTE over parent_id — the same shape the
lineage resolver already uses — covers every descendant and runs on
idx_parentId_name.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(gui): give each item its own share dialog
single_instance keyed the dialog on the app id alone, so opening
Share… on a second file focused the first file's dialog — typing a
recipient there granted access to the wrong file, with only the title
hinting at it. The dialog is now instanced per path: same item
refocuses, different item opens fresh. Also stops pre-encoding the
title, which UIWindow encodes again.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat(permissions): let manage answer a write check
A manage grant let its holder re-share a folder but not work in it: the
ACL mode family stops at write, and the fs exploder had no rule for the
narrowest mode, so `manage:fs:<uid>` never satisfied `fs:<uid>:write`.
Fold manage into the candidate list for every non-manage mode, in both
the access-token branch and the scan branch, and give `write` an (empty)
exploder rule so the manage arm is emitted for it too.
* fix(fs): authorize restructuring by write on the parent
* fix(fs): let a share recipient work inside a shared folder
rename, remove and move refused outright when the entry belonged to
someone else, so a recipient with write could neither delete nor rename
anything inside a folder shared with them. The GUI compounded it by
hiding Delete for any item it did not own.
Authorize the three by ACL write on the entry's parent. For an owner
that is the same answer; for a recipient it grants the inside of a
shared folder and withholds the folder itself, whose parent is the
owner's private tree.
Deleting sends the item to its owner's trash rather than the deleter's,
so it leaves the recipient's view without leaving the owner's account
and without changing hands. A move may not otherwise carry someone
else's entry out of their tree.
* fix(fs): give a new entry to the owner of the folder it lands in
A file a share recipient added to a shared folder was recorded as
theirs while living in the owner's tree, so a subtree could hold rows
belonging to several people — and the storage it consumed was checked
against the writer while being counted against the owner.
Take the owner from the parent row at every insert, charge the
allowance to that owner, and hand a moved entry over to the tree it
moves into. An entry now always belongs to whoever owns the directory
holding it.
* feat(fs): address shared entries as ~/share/<uid>
A recipient could read the owner's whole path off any shared entry —
where they keep the file and what sits beside it, neither of which the
share is about.
Give shares their own namespace. `~/share/<entry-uid>/rel/path` resolves
to the real path on the way in, and outgoing paths are rewritten to it
on the way out. Entries the actor owns pass through untouched, so no
existing client contract moves.
* revert(fs): mask only the directory bar, not the addressing
|