Eric DubéandGitHub 814791872f Manual package updates, npm audit --force, etc (#2669) ...

* chore: upgrade git-date (used for release notes generator)

* chore: update vitest, vitest plugins, and svgo

* chore: run `npm audit fix`

* chore: run `npm audit --force`

* meta: empty commit to run git tests

* fix: tests gone because of a... syntax error?

I question GitHub's judgement of handling a syntax error in the file
that defines tests to run on PRs by pretending everything is fine and
passing all PRs. That to me seems like the worst possible way to handle
that. I think they should have done it not like that.

2026-03-17 12:43:17 -07:00

..

workflows

Manual package updates, npm audit --force, etc (#2669)

2026-03-17 12:43:17 -07:00

FUNDING.yml

Create FUNDING.yml

2024-11-10 08:48:12 -08:00