* fix(process): name the reason two captures cannot be compared
compare-process-captures rejected captures whose comparison contracts
differ, but the reason never reached the caller. The CLI printed
"Process command could not complete... run `rea doctor`". MCP wrapped
the error in an AnalysisInputError with no issues ("Analysis input is
invalid. Check the arguments"). A stale capture under
max_capture_age_ms got the same treatment.
Throw typed input issues that name the differing contract fields, or
the stale side with its completion time and age, and let
runDerivedOperation pass AnalysisInputError through unchanged. Document
what the comparison contract covers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(process): report CLI trace-spec issues under the MCP input path
The CLI reported an invalid trace specification under operation
"compare-process-captures" with root-relative issue paths such as
["events"]. MCP reports the same input as compare_process_captures with
paths under trace_spec. Use the canonical operation name and prefix
trace_spec so both surfaces describe the same input identically.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(process): name the side and constraint for unusable capture Evidence
Adjacent compare_process_captures failures still lost their reason.
Over MCP, Evidence from another workflow, tampered Evidence and an
invalid capture result all became "Evidence is invalid or has changed".
The CLI said only "Capture evidence is malformed".
Parse each side separately. Evidence from another workflow is an input
issue on left or right that names the operation and predicate it has.
Tampered Evidence and invalid capture results stay integrity
mismatches, and their message now carries the validation detail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
