fix(typescript): extract abstract method signatures

An abstract class's `abstract area(): number;` parses as
`abstract_method_signature`, which was not a TypeScript function type, so the
abstract method was dropped. An interface's `method_signature` has long been a
function type, so `interface D { draw(): void }` put `draw` in the graph — but
the identical contract on an `abstract class` did not.

The result: the base of an abstract class kept only its concrete methods, a
polymorphic `shape.area()` had no declaration to resolve to, and the overridden
contract had no node to carry it.

An abstract method is the same kind of contract as an interface method: a
subclass must implement it. Add `abstract_method_signature` to the TS function
types (inherited by the TSX config). Its name sits on the same `name` field as
`method_signature`, so no other change is needed. Abstract fields
(`public_field_definition`) are left as-is, matching concrete fields which are
not nodes either.

Added tests/test_ts_abstract_methods.py: the abstract method becomes a node,
a call through the abstract type resolves to it, and it reaches parity with the
interface method it mirrors.

(cherry picked from commit 2100098042)

graphify/extract.py

@@ -1266,7 +1266,12 @@ _TS_CONFIG = LanguageConfig(
         "enum_declaration",        # named enums
         "type_alias_declaration",  # named type aliases
     }),
-    function_types=frozenset({"function_declaration", "generator_function_declaration", "method_definition", "method_signature"}),
+    # `abstract_method_signature`: an abstract class's method is a contract
+    # declaration exactly like an `interface`'s `method_signature` (already
+    # captured) — a subclass must implement it. Without it the abstract method
+    # was dropped, so the base of an `abstract class` sat in the graph with only
+    # its concrete methods and no node for the overridden contract.
+    function_types=frozenset({"function_declaration", "generator_function_declaration", "method_definition", "method_signature", "abstract_method_signature"}),
     import_types=frozenset({"import_statement", "export_statement"}),
     call_types=frozenset({"call_expression", "new_expression"}),
     call_function_field="function",

tests/test_ts_abstract_methods.py

@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+"""An `abstract` method of an abstract class is a node, like an interface method.
+
+`method_signature` (an interface's method) has been a TypeScript function type
+for a while, so `interface Drawable { draw(): void }` puts `draw` in the graph.
+An abstract class's `abstract area(): number;` parses as a DIFFERENT node,
+`abstract_method_signature`, which was not a function type — so the abstract
+method was dropped. The base of an `abstract class` kept only its concrete
+methods, and a polymorphic `shape.area()` had no declaration to resolve to and
+no node to carry the overridden contract.
+
+An abstract method is the same kind of contract as an interface method: a
+subclass must implement it. These specs pin that the declaration becomes a node
+and that calls through it resolve, matching the interface behaviour.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import os
+import tempfile
+from pathlib import Path
+
+from graphify.extract import extract
+
+
+def _extract(tmp_path, files: dict[str, str]) -> dict:
+    for name, body in files.items():
+        p = tmp_path / name
+        p.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
+        p.write_text(body)
+    old = os.getcwd()
+    try:
+        os.chdir(tmp_path)
+        return extract([Path(n) for n in files], cache_root=Path(tempfile.mkdtemp()))
+    finally:
+        os.chdir(old)
+
+
+def _method_edge(r: dict, owner: str, method: str) -> bool:
+    labels = {n["id"]: str(n.get("label", "")) for n in r["nodes"]}
+    return any(
+        e.get("relation") == "method"
+        and labels.get(e.get("source")) == owner
+        and labels.get(e.get("target")) == method
+        for e in r["edges"]
+    )
+
+
+def _calls(r: dict, src: str, tgt: str) -> bool:
+    labels = {n["id"]: str(n.get("label", "")) for n in r["nodes"]}
+    return any(
+        e.get("relation") == "calls"
+        and labels.get(e.get("source")) == src
+        and labels.get(e.get("target")) == tgt
+        for e in r["edges"]
+    )
+
+
+def test_abstract_method_becomes_a_node(tmp_path):
+    r = _extract(tmp_path, {"s.ts": (
+        "abstract class Shape {\n"
+        "  abstract area(): number;\n"
+        "}\n"
+    )})
+    assert _method_edge(r, "Shape", ".area()")
+
+
+def test_abstract_and_concrete_methods_both_present(tmp_path):
+    r = _extract(tmp_path, {"s.ts": (
+        "abstract class Shape {\n"
+        "  abstract area(): number;\n"
+        "  describe(): string { return this.area().toString(); }\n"
+        "}\n"
+    )})
+    assert _method_edge(r, "Shape", ".area()")
+    assert _method_edge(r, "Shape", ".describe()")
+    # The concrete method that calls the abstract one links to it.
+    assert _calls(r, ".describe()", ".area()")
+
+
+def test_call_through_abstract_type_resolves_to_the_declaration(tmp_path):
+    r = _extract(tmp_path, {"s.ts": (
+        "abstract class Shape {\n"
+        "  abstract area(): number;\n"
+        "}\n"
+        "function use(s: Shape): number {\n"
+        "  return s.area();\n"
+        "}\n"
+    )})
+    assert _calls(r, "use()", ".area()")
+
+
+def test_abstract_method_parity_with_interface_method(tmp_path):
+    # Same shape via an interface already worked; the abstract class must match.
+    r = _extract(tmp_path, {"s.ts": (
+        "interface Drawable {\n"
+        "  draw(): void;\n"
+        "}\n"
+        "abstract class Widget {\n"
+        "  abstract draw(): void;\n"
+        "}\n"
+    )})
+    assert _method_edge(r, "Drawable", ".draw()")
+    assert _method_edge(r, "Widget", ".draw()")